Banff Histopathological Consensus Criteria for Preimplantation Kidney Biopsies.

The Banff working group on preimplantation biopsy was established to develop consensus criteria (best practice guidelines) for the interpretation of preimplantation kidney biopsies. Digitally scanned slides were used (i) to evaluate interobserver variability of histopathologic findings, comparing frozen sections with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue of wedge and needle core biopsies, and (ii) to correlate consensus histopathologic findings with graft outcome in a cohort of biopsies from international medical centers. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) and univariable and multivariable statistical analyses were performed. Good to fair reproducibility was observed in semiquantitative scores for percentage of glomerulosclerosis, arterial intimal fibrosis and interstitial fibrosis on frozen wedge biopsies. Evaluation of frozen wedge and core biopsies was comparable for number of glomeruli, but needle biopsies showed worse ICCs for glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. A consensus evaluation form is provided to help standardize the reporting of histopathologic lesions in donor biopsies. It should be recognized that histologic parameters may not correlate with graft outcome in studies based on organs deemed to be acceptable after careful clinical assessment. Significant limitations remain in the assessment of implantation biopsies.

Benefits of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim prophylaxis on rates of sepsis after kidney transplant.

BACKGROUND: The use of potent immunosuppression increases the risk of infectious complications following kidney transplantation. Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) is an inexpensive broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent used in our center as lifelong prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii, unless contraindicated. This study evaluated the clinical impact of SMX/TMP prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis with SMX/TMP (NoPPx), but with alternative agents. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of renal transplant recipients (RTR) transplanted from January 2002 through December 2010. Patients were divided into SMX/TMP group and NoPPX group, based on whether they received prophylaxis with SMX/TMP or not, and rates of sepsis were compared between groups. We also analyzed the pathogens and source implicated in these episodes, as well as the dose of SMX/TMP. Rates were compared using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 4.8 (± 2.5) years, 63 cases of sepsis occurred in 1224 patients (5.1%), and 60% of these cases had a urinary source. The risk of sepsis was significantly reduced with prophylaxis vs. NoPPx (13.3% vs. 4.3% for SMX/TMP, P < 0.001), and this association was maintained through multivariate regression. Sepsis was associated with a numerically increased risk of graft loss and death that was not significantly affected by use of SMX/TMP. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with SMX/TMP is an inexpensive way to reduce the incidence of sepsis in RTR.